State v. Ammons’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently May 2010 · most notably Amalgamated Transit v. State (2000), In Re Personal Restraint of Andress (2002)
29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 121 Wash. 2d 552 - Hanson v. City of Snohomish · Wilson Court v. Tony Maroni's · 97 Wash. 2d 255 - State v. Danforth · 119 Wash. 2d 204 - State v. Speaks · Double D Hop Ranch v. Sanchez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person is guilty of escape in the first degree if, being detained pursuant to a conviction of a felony ... he escapes from custody or a detention facility.[ [3] ]”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“can be either (1) restraint pursuant to an order of a court or (2) any period of service on a work crew. Under either definition, Mr. Ammons and Mr. Guy were in custody. The escape statute does not define the term”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“"Custody" means restraint pursuant to a lawful arrest or an order of a court, or any period of service on a work crew....”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ammons · State v. LW
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.