Duskin v. Carlson’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently November 2017
4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Storhoff · Gil Enterprises, Inc. v. Delvy · 22 Misc. 2d 461 - Gershman v. Barted Realty Corp. · Freitag v. Huiskamp · Duskin v. Carlson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Mr. Duskin to elect. Under RCW 51.24.050(1), an injured worker's election not to proceed with a third-party action operates as an assignment of the cause of action to the Department. However, the Department has no authority to require the injured worker to exercise the right of election until the Department serves”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Duskin v. Carlson“requirement. An inadequate letter does not suddenly become adequate because it is unread. [4] Thus, contrary to the majority's conclusion, Mr. Duskin's claimed prejudice is not”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Duskin v. Carlson“as required under RCW 51.24.070. I disagree and would affirm the decision and reasoning of the Court of Appeals. By defining a legal demand”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Duskin v. Carlson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.