Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 136 WASH2D 678 - State v. Walker

State v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
February 2009
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Chimel v. California · United States v. Matlock · McDonald v. United States · State v. Hendrickson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]here the police have obtained consent to search from an individual possessing, at best, equal control over the premises, that consent remains valid against a cohabitant, who also possesses equal control, only while the cohabitant is absent.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When a search pursuant to a warrant would be constitutional, a warrant can almost always be obtained. The wise course for the police is not to rely on the consent of a private person unless they must. When the police do rely on consent, either (1) they could not have obtained a warrant because a constitutional requirement like probable cause was not met; or (2) they could have obtained a warrant but did not; or (3) the constitutional requirements were met, but the police could not obtain a warrant for other reasons, such as the unavailability of a magistrate. In the first two situations, the courts should place a heavy burden of proving consent on the police.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “) (citing Leach, 113 Wash.2d at 744 , 782 P.2d 1035 ). Leach is on point and dispositive. We might also bear in mind the dictates of Leach do not present an undue burden for law enforcement. Absent consent from all co-occupants, a warrant provides the necessary lawful authority. Other Concerns Here, the police conducted a warrantless search of a home without justifying their failure to resort to a neutral magistrate for a warrant. In general we require law enforcement to turn to a neutral magistrate”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.