Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 136 WASH2D 946 - Phillips v. King County

Phillips v. King County’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
4
states following
March 2016
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably City of Keller v. Wilson (2005), Phillips v. King County (1998)

29 state decisions

240199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 115 Wash. 2d 506 - ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co. · 111 Wash. 2d 159 - Taylor v. Stevens County · 104 Wash. 2d 677 - Bradley v. American Smelting and Refining Co. · 109 Wash. 2d 621 - Orion Corporation v. State · 64 Wash. 2d 309 - Martin v. Port of Seattle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) a taking or damaging (2) of private property (3) for public use (4) without just compensation being paid (5) by a governmental entity that has not instituted formal proceedings.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[n]o private property shall be taken or damaged for public or private use without just compensation having been first made.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “`[I]nverse condemnation' is used to describe an action alleging a governmental `taking,' brought to recover the value of the property which has been appropriated in fact, but with no formal exercise of the power of eminent domain.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.