136 Wis. 2d 501 - Petersen v. Dane County’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2019
10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City · MacDonald, Sommer & Frates v. Yolo County · San Diego Gas & Electric Co. v. City of San Diego · Burnham v. Planning & Zoning Commission · 106 Wis. 2d 368 - State v. Alles
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is essential to a claim that a regulatory action has 'taken' property that a 'final, definitive position' has been established by the regulatory agency as to how it will apply the regulations at issue to the land in question.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Since the town board members acted in a legislative capacity, they were entitled to apply to the decisionmaking process their personal knowledge and experience.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.