136 Wis. 2d 92 - State v. Perry’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
86 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 88 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably 137 Wis. 2d 31 - State v. Hoa Duc Pham (1987), State v. Lane (1998)
86 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Trudo v. United States · Hardy v. United States · 124 Wis. 2d 681 - State v. Wyss · United States v. Sacco · United States v. Rosa
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 88 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“where a conflict exists between a court's oral pronouncement of sentence and a written judgment, the oral pronouncement controls.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“Any failure of the appellate process which prevents a putative appellant from demonstrating possible error constitutes a constitutional deprivation of the right to appeal.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“As a matter of Wisconsin constitutional law, the right to an appeal is absolute: Writs of error shall never be prohibited, and shall be issued by such courts as the legislature designates by law.' Wisconsin Const., art. I, sec. 21(1). Since the reorganization of the Wisconsin court system in 1977, the court so designated is the court of appeals which has initial appellate jurisdiction as set forth in Wis. Const., art VII, sec. 5(3). The legislature has specifically stated, 'A writ of error may be sought in the court of appeals. 1 Section 808.02, Stats. Thus, the right of appeal to the court of appeals is constitutionally guaranteed in the State of Wisconsin.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.