Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 136 W. Va. 342 - State v. Hatfield

136 W. Va. 342 - State v. Hatfield’s Empirical Analysis

1951

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
2
states following
July 1999
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently July 1999

14 state decisions

6019511960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stout v. Philippi Manufacturing & Mercantile Co. · 122 W. Va. 639 - Shields v. Romine · Hughes & Co. v. Hamilton · Kable v. Mitchell · Franklin v. T. H. Lilly Lumber Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The trial court should, of course, exercise extreme caution in considering upset bids received from persons who were present and participated in the bidding at the previous sale, with a view toward preventing any abuse of the practice of receiving upset bids, or in any way delaying the progress of the litigation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “That is the stage at which the court may open anew the bidding upon an advanced offer, substantial and made in good faith. But even at this stage it is always discretionary with a court whether it will confirm a sale, though made and complied with in all respects as required by its decree, or set it aside and direct a resale. Whether a court will confirm must de pend in great measure on the circumstances in each case....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.