Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 137 Ariz. 105 - State v. Spoon

State v. Spoon’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
2
states following
January 2002
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently January 2002 · most notably State v. Carriger (1984), State v. Lambright (1983)

30 state decisions

220198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Edwards v. Arizona · Sandstrom v. Montana · Rideout v. United States · County Court of Ulster Cty. v. Allen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The State must prove that the defendant has done an act which is forbidden by law and that he intended to do it. You may determine that the defendant intended to do the act if he did it voluntarily-”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.