Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 137 Cal. 619 - Beveridge v. Lewis

Beveridge v. Lewis’s Empirical Analysis

1902

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
11
states following
July 2013
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 56 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently July 2013 · most notably 70 Cal. 2d 282 - Pierpont Inn, Inc. v. State of California (1969), Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co. (1915)

2 federal appellate · 56 state decisions — followed in 11 states

160190219101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Yick Wo v. Hopkins · California Pacific R.R. v. Armstrong · Moran v. Ross

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘ ‘ The chance that land will increase in value as population increases and new facilities for transportation and new markets are created is an element of value quite generally taken into consideration in the purchase of land in estimating its present market value. This chance for gain is the property of the land-owner. If a part of his property is taken for the construction of the railway, he stands in reference to the other property not taken like similar property-owners in the neighborhood. His neighbors are not required to surrender this prospective enhancement of value in order to secure the increased facilities which the railroad will afford. If he is compelled to contribute all that he could possibly gain by the improvement, while others in all respects similarly affected by it are not required to do so, he does not receive the equal protection of the law. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “consist in an increase in the value of land common to the community generally, from advantages which will accrue to the community from the improvement,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.