137 Cal. App. 701 - Johnson v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1934
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 1962
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kanopka v. Kanopka · Hill v. West End Street Railway Co. · 116 Cal. App. 1 - Fishman v. Silva · Whiteacre v. Boston Elevated Railway Co. · 117 Cal. App. 208 - Johnston v. Peairs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Accordingly, the fact that he did not know that any one was on the highway, is no excuse for the conduct, which would have amounted to recklessness, if he had known that another vehicle or person was on the highway.” Johnson v. Johnson (1934) 137 Cal.App. 701 , 31 P.2d 237 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Smith v. Sharp
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.