Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 137 CALAPP 737 - People v. Lanham

People v. Lanham’s Empirical Analysis

1934

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
4
states following
January 2011
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently January 2011 · most notably 9 Cal. 4th 331 - People v. Scott (1994), 11 Cal. 4th 434 - People v. Martinez (1995)

29 state decisions

110193419401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Gardner · 78 Cal. App. 685 - People v. Rambaud · 78 Cal. App. 702 - People v. Sachau · People v. Burns · 25 Cal. App. 630 - People v. Dabner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The contention of the appellant is that the evidence does not show that the defendant actually, placed his hands upon, or that they came in contact with, the legs or any portion of the body of the child. “The information does specifically allege that the defendant so acted; that his hands came in contact with the legs of the little girl. The crime, however, denounced by section 288, supra, is complete, or may be completed without any such actual contact.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “`It is common knowledge and common experience to conclude that in removing the panties of the child the hands of the one removing the panties would necessarily and undoubtably come in contact with the body of the child so outraged.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.