137 Cal. App. 4th 1244 - Aaron v. Dunham’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 46 Cal. 2d 818 - People v. Watson · 66 Cal. 2d 841 - County of Sacramento v. Hickman · 33 Cal. 4th 780 - Cassim v. Allstate Insurance · 50 Cal. 3d 402 - Mutual Life Insurance v. City of Los Angeles · 35 Cal. 3d 564 - Warsaw v. Chicago Metallic Ceilings, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[C]ontinuous use of an easement over a long period of time without the landowner's interference is presumptive evidence of its existence and in the absence of evidence of mere permissive use it will be sufficient to sustain a judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“continuous use over a long period of time constitutes communication of the claim of right”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.