Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 137 Colo. 74 - Rodgers v. Rodgers

Rodgers v. Rodgers’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 1964
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Morris v. Propst · Hoffer v. Hoffer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * If there is any magic to the entry of a formal final decree, which the Court is not required to do under Colorado law, prior orders of the Court were merged therein by the words which we find in the final decree, to-wit: ‘upon the terms and conditions contained in the interlocutory decree of any modification or change thereof subsequently made by the Court.’ “Consistent with the entire litigation, the Court ties its final orders to the temporary orders.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.