Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 137 CONNAPP 173 - State v. Mucha

State v. Mucha’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
November 2025
most recently cited

19 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · State v. Golding · State v. Williams · White v. Burdick · State v. Singh

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Two threshold conditions must be satisfied in order to invoice the warnings constitutionally required by Miranda [v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 478-79 , 86 S. Ct. 1602 , 16 L. Ed. 2d 694 (1966)]: (1) the defendant must have been in custody; and (2) the defendant must have been subjected to police interrogation. ... A person is in custody only if, in view of all of the surrounding circumstances, a reasonable person would have believed he was not free to leave. . . . The ultimate inquiry [therefore] is simply whether there is a formal arrest or restraint on freedom of movement of the degree associated with a formal arrest.” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) State v. Mucha, 137 Conn. App. 173, 188-89 , 47 A.3d 931 , cert. denied, 307 Conn. 912 , 53 A.3d 998 (2012).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A notorious article,, prominently displayed in a local newspaper with a blaring headline, a boxed quotation or an accompanying photograph stating or displaying prejudicial information about a case might raise the possibility of juror exposure ... at least to the point of requiring further judicial inquiry, re- . -gardless of whether the jury was in- . structed to avoid media coverage. In this case, however, ... where the prejudicial content of the article was not so overtly and conspicuously published, there is no reason to believe that a diligent juror, attempting to follow the court’s instructions to avoid all media coverage of the case, would ever be exposed to it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “statements and argument of counsel are not evidence”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.