Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 137 CONNAPP 283 - In re Severina D.

In re Severina D.’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Stanley v. Illinois · In re Juvenile Appeal (83-CD) · In re Juvenile Appeal (84-AB) · In re Shamika F. · Bender v. Bender

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[b]ecause it is the trial court's function to weigh the evidence and determine credibility, we give great deference to its findings.... In reviewing factual findings, [w]e do not examine the record to determine whether the [court] could have reached a conclusion other than the one reached.... Instead, we make every reasonable presumption ... in favor of the trial court's ruling.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.