Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 137 CONNAPP 782 - State v. Thomas

State v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on B.D. International Discount Corp. v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A. · Porter v. States · State v. Curcio · Gonzalez v. Thaler · State v. Aillon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The common-law doctrine of collateral estoppel, or issue preclusion, embodies a judicial policy in favor of judicial economy, the stability of former judgments and finality.... For an issue to be subject to collateral estoppel, it must have been fully and fairly litigated in the first action. It also must have been actually decided and the decision must have been necessary to the judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he issue concerning which relitigation is sought to be estopped must be identical to the issue decided in the prior proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.