137 F. 1018
Docket No.232.
Second Circuit Court of Appeals
Decided May 2, 1905.)
Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1905-05-02
<p>In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Connecticut.</p>
Cited by 4 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 1950
1 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
2 counsel of record
Relies on William Vanderbilt v. Ferdinand Eidman · Brown v. Kinney
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1905-05-02
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Connecticut.
¶2W. R. Tijlinghast, for plaintiffs in error.
¶3F. H. Parker, for defendant in error.
¶4Before WALLACE, TOWNSEND, and COXE, Circuit Judges.
¶6Upon authority of decision of United States Supreme Court in Vanderbilt v. Eidman, 25 Sup. Ct. 331, the judgment (128 Fed. 310) is reversed in open court, and cansé remanded, with instructions to overrule the demurrer.