Ford v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
137 F. 149 · 1905
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently May 1974
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Thompson v. Insurance Co. · Latta v. Kilbourn · Monroe Cattle Co. v. Becker · Dravo v. Fabel · Vigel v. Hopp
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where the complainant does not waive an answer to the bill under oath, an answer under oath, which distinctly denies the material allegations of the complaint, not only makes an issue, but proves it to the extent that it will require the evidence of,two witnesses, or of one witness and other circumstances equivalent to a second, to overthrow the answer.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Ford v. Taylor
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.