Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 137 F.1d 161 - Sussman v. Porter

Sussman v. Porter’s Empirical Analysis

137 F. 161 · 1905

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
June 1933
most recently cited

2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1933

2 state decisions

101905191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Oscanyan v. Arms Co. · Alexander Marshall v. The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company · Tool Company v. Norris · Crichfield v. Bermudez Asphalt Paving Co. · Rose & Hawley v. Truax

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.