Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 137 F.2d 166 - Abbott Machine Co. v. Universal Winding Co.

Abbott Machine Co. v. Universal Winding Co.’s Empirical Analysis

137 F.2d 166 · 1943

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
June 1965
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 1965

2 federal appellate · 3 district ·

40194319501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 35 U.S.C. § 31

Relies on Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co. · Cuno Engineering Corporation v. Automatic Devices Corporation · Loom Company v. Higgins · Altoona Publix Theatres, Inc. v. American Tri-Ergon Corp. · Reckendorfer v. Faber

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.