In re Henneman’s Empirical Analysis
137 F.2d 627 · 1943
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently October 1994
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 377 · 28 U.S.C. § 41 · 48 U.S.C. § 752 · 48 U.S.C. § 863 · 48 U.S.C. § 864
Relies on Roche v. Evaporated Milk Ass'n · McClellan v. Carland · Puerto Rico v. Russell & Co. · Ames v. State of Kansas Johnston Kansas Pac Ry Co · In re Pennsylvania Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The general object of the act is to contract the jurisdiction of the federal courts. The abrogation of the writ of error and appeal would have had little effect in putting an end to the question of removal if the writ of mandamus could still have been sued out in this court. * * * Still, although the writ of mandamus is not mentioned in the section, yet the use of the words `such remand shall be immediately carried into execution,' in addition to the prohibition of appeal and writ of error, is strongly indicative of an intent to suppress further prolongation of the controversy by whatever process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.