Brown v. Beckham’s Empirical Analysis
137 F.2d 644 · 1943
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently February 2007
5 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 520
Relies on Caminetti v. United States · Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States · Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. Bismarck Lumber Co. · Board of Liquidation v. McComb · Automatic Devices Corporation v. Sinko Tool & Manufacturing Company
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“are available under the circumstances and in the manner provided by the law of the state in which the district court is held,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“any existing statute of the United States governs to the extent to which it is applicable; * * *”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.