Thatsaphone v. Weber’s Empirical Analysis
137 F.3d 1041 · 1998
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently April 2024
12 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Berkemer v. McCarty · Lindh v. Murphy · Colorado v. Connelly · Oregon v. Mathiason
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the ultimate issue is whether a reasonable police officer conducting [an] otherwise noncustodial interview would have given Miranda warnings because he realized that the questioning would be perceived by [the defendant] as custodial due to his limited English language skills.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a suspect’s language skills may be relevant to the ‘in custody’ issue” within the context of Miranda warnings, but”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.