Martinez v. Gomez’s Empirical Analysis
137 F.3d 1124 · 1998
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently December 2010
6 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Wilson v. Garcia · Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. Tomanio · WMX Technologies, Inc. v. Miller · McDougal v. County of Imperial · 34 Cal. 3d 644 - People v. Yates
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]t is clear that there is nothing further [the plaintiff] can do and the district court must have intended this order to end the case. Therefore, we treat the dismissal as a final order.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a] dismissal of a complaint without prejudice is not a final order.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.