United States v. Cihak’s Empirical Analysis
137 F.3d 252 · 1998
Citation profile
25 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2025 · most notably United States v. Solis (2002), United States v. El-Mezain (2011)
25 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Brown v. Ohio · G-K Development Co. v. Broadmoor Place Investments · United States v. Aguilar · Sanders v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) First City paid Banner [Bloch's company] for Bloch’s consulting services; (2) Bloch deposited the checks from First City into Banner’s account; (3) the funds were then wired to another Banner account; (4) from this account, Bloch drew checks payable to himself; (5) these checks were deposited into his personal account; (6) checks made payable to Landan [Cihak’s attorney] were then drawn on this account; (7) these checks were deposited into Lan-dan’s firm's account; (8) from this account, Landan issued checks payable to various banks as payment on Cihak’s outstanding debts and to make investments for Cihak.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“No one factor of the Marable analysis is determinative; rather all five factors must be considered in combination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“money laundering, 18 U.S.C. 1956(a)(1)(B) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.