Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 137 F.3d 836 - Baldwin v. Stalder

Baldwin v. Stalder’s Empirical Analysis

137 F.3d 836 · 1998

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
2
states following
June 2020
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently June 2020 · most notably Wagner v. Bay City (2000), Danley v. Allen (2008)

13 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

3401998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hudson v. McMillian · Johnson v. Glick · Lee v. Texas · Antonelli v. Illinois · Siglar II v. Hightower

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “See Ham Marine, Inc. v. Dresser Indus., Inc., 72 F.3d 454 , 459 (5th Cir.1995) (quoting Watkins v. Petro-Search, Inc., 689 F.2d 537 , 538 (5th Cir.1982)). We review bench trial findings of fact for clear error. See Baldwin v. Stalder, 137 F.3d 836 , 839 (5th Cir.1998). Such a finding is clearly erroneous”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The Eighth Amendment's prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment necessarily excludes from constitutional recognition de minimis uses of force, provided that the use of force is not of a sort repugnant to the conscience of mankind.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The amount of force that is constitutionally permissible ... must be judged by the context in which that force is deployed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.