Huckabay v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
137 F.3d 871 · 1998
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1981A · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 703 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson · Patterson v. McLean Credit Union · Douglass v. United Services Automobile Ass'n
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“acts, but we specifically have held that the mere receipt of a paycheck does not constitute a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Huckabay v. Moore“does not require specificity in pleading time and place.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Huckabay v. Moore“fair and just”; it does not use the term to mean”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Huckabay v. Moore
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.