Held v. T Held’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently June 2013
1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Alexander v. United States · McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco · Chase Securities Corp. v. Donaldson · Alexander v. United States · 78 Ill. 2d 555 - Chicago Park District v. Kenroy, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Of course, allegations of residence are insufficient to establish diversity jurisdiction. It is well-settled that “[wjhen the parties allege residence but not citizenship, the court must dismiss the suit.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Illinois courts give a strict interpretation to the meaning of a written contract within the statute of limitations. For statute of limitations purposes, a contract is considered to be written if all the essential terms of the contract are in writing and are ascertainable from the instrument itself.... If parol evidence is needed to make the contract complete, then the contract is treated as being oral under the statute of limitations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.