Lowe v. Shah

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided July 1, 2005

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2005-07-01

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics

Decided 2005-07-01

PER CURIAM.

¶1James Edward Lowe, III, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on.his Bivens * complaint. We have reviewed *609the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Lowe v. Shah, No. CA-03-1423-1 (E.D.Va. Mar. 4, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2AFFIRMED

¶3Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).