Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 137 Fla. 1 - Hygema v. Markley

Hygema v. Markley’s Empirical Analysis

1939

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
April 2013
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 2013

4 state decisions

20193919401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kreiss Potassium Phosphate Co. v. Knight · 12 E.H. Smith 313 - Olmstead v. . Latimer · Davis v. Stout · Fridenberg v. Robinson · Mitchell v. Harper

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “was not definite but, on the contrary, was entirely indefinite as to terms and time.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.