Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 137 Fla. 324 - State Ex Rel. James v. Gerrell

State Ex Rel. James v. Gerrell’s Empirical Analysis

1938

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
August 1987
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently August 1987

2 federal appellate · 17 state decisions

80193819401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State ex rel. Bonsteel v. Allen · Perry Trading Co. v. City of Tallahassee · Levy v. Stone · Roach v. Ephren · Hamilton v. Collins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Section Eight of Chapter 18069 also provides that it shall not apply to any person who is a resident of Florida engaged in selling goods, wares, or merchandise for a period of twelve months in the year, provided said person, firm, or corporation shall have maintained and conducted an established place of business for such purposes, and has been engaged in such business for a period of not less than five years in the community wherein the auction sale is to be held. "Here we have a classification based on residence and the length of time one has been engaged in business. This Court has condemned classifications based solely on the ground of residence or on the difference of time the persons licensed have been engaged in business, and there appearing no other basis for this classification, we are impelled to hold it bad."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “"In the imposition of excise or license taxes, the courts will enforce the observance of the due process and equal protection provisions of the Constitution. For this reason, such taxes cannot be unreasonable or arbitrary, either as to basis of classification or amount of the tax imposed."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.