Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 137 FRD 310 - Yagman v. Republic Insurance

Yagman v. Republic Insurance’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
May 1995
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 401 · 28 U.S.C. § 455

Relies on Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. Pemberton · In re Disbarment of Johnson · Gozlon-Peretz v. United States · Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Stephen Yagman is sanctioned under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 18 U.S.C. § 401 (3), and the inherent power of the Court. A copy of this Order and the Order of March 27, 1991 shall be sent to the State Bar of California with a recommendation that Stephen Yagman be disciplined appropriately.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “neither monetary sanctions nor suspension appear to be effective in deterring Yagman's pestiferous conduct,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.