Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 137 FSUPP2D 69 - Hinebaugh v. Wiley

Hinebaugh v. Wiley’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
September 2018
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 636

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Scheuer v. Rhodes · Wolff v. McDonnell · Preiser v. Rodriguez · Superintendent Massachusetts Correctional Institution Walpole v. Hill

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[u]nder the standard enunciated in Wolff , the Court will not independently assess the ... officer's reliability,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “provided 'some evidence' for the disciplinary body to make their finding regarding [the inmate]'s guilt”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.