137 F. Supp. 2d 874 - Grutter v. Bollinger’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(1) whether the stay applicant has made a strong showing that he is likely to succeed on the merits; (2) whether the applicant will be irreparably injured absent a stay; (3) whether issuance of the stay will substantially injure the other parties interested in the proceeding; and (4) where the public interest lies. Grutter v. Bollinger, 137 F.Supp.2d 874, 875 (E.D.Mich.2001), citing Hilton v. Braunskill, 481 U.S. 770, 776 , 107 S.Ct. 2113 , 95 L.Ed.2d 724 (1987).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 207 F. Supp. 2d 663 - Fullmer v. Michigan Department of State Police

2. “When an appeal is taken from an interlocutory or final judgment granting, dissolving, or denying an injunction, the court in its discretion may suspend, modify, restore, or grant an injunction during the pendency of the appeal upon such terms as to bond or otherwise as it considers proper for the security of the rights of the adverse party ...”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 207 F. Supp. 2d 663 - Fullmer v. Michigan Department of State Police

3. ““... even if an [applicant] demonstrates irreparable harm that decidedly outweighs any potential harm to the [adverse party]” if a stay is granted, he is still required to show, at a minimum, “serious questions going to the merits.” Id.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 207 F. Supp. 2d 663 - Fullmer v. Michigan Department of State Police