Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 137 FSUPP2D 985 - In Re Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc.

In Re Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
May 2016
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292

Relies on Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp. · Firefighters Local Union No. 1784 v. Stotts · Evans v. Jeff D. Ex Rel. Johnson · Supreme Tribe of Ben-Hur v. Cauble · Castano v. American Tobacco Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the plaintiffs’ likelihood of ultimate success on the merits balanced against the amount and form of relief offered in settlement; (2) the complexity, expense and likely duration of the litigation; (3) the stage of the proceedings and the amount of discovery completed; (4) the judgment of experienced trial counsel; (5) the nature of the negotiations; (6) the objections raised by the class members; and (7) the public interest.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.