137 Ga. App. 423 - Sowards v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(1) If a security interest in goods was perfected and subsequently the goods or a part thereof have become part of a product or mass, the security interest continues in the product or mass if; (a) The goods are so manufactured, processed, assembled, or commingled that their identity is lost in the product or mass; or (b) A financing statement covering the original goods also covers the product into which the goods have been manufactured, processed, or assembled. (2) When under subsection (1) of this Code section more than one security interest attaches to the product or mass, they rank equally according to the ratio that the cost of the goods to which each interest originally attached bears to the cost of the total product or mass.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Smith Drug Co. v. Pharr-Luke (In Re Pharr-Luke)