Lambert v. Waha’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hawaii Community Federal Credit Union v. Keka · Kawamata Farms, Inc. v. United Agri Products · State v. Higa · Association of Apartment Owners of Wailea Elua v. Wailea Resort Co. · Querubin v. Thronas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Conclusions of law are reviewed de novo , under the right/wrong standard of review.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“no discernable argument supporting this specific challenge is raised”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[S]ummary judgment is appropriate if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. A fact is material if proof of that fact would have the effect of establishing or refuting one of the essential elements of a cause of action or defense asserted by the parties. The evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the non-moving party. In other words, we must view all of the evidence and the inferences drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.