Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 137 ILL 68 - Smith v. Mace

Smith v. Mace’s Empirical Analysis

1891

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
January 1937
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 1937

10 state decisions

4018911900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fitch v. Wetherbee · Sweezy v. Chandler · Borders v. Murphy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A title acquired at an execution sale upon redemption by a junior judgment creditor relates back to the judgment from which the redemption is made, and is paramount to any title acquired subsequent to the beginning of the lien of that judgment. The junior judgment may not, itself, have been a lien upon the property redeemed, — it is the lien of the senior judgment that is enforced.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.