Turner v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
1965
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on James C. Curtis & Co. v. Emmerling · 124 Ind. App. 511 - HUGHES v. St. Bank of W. Terre Haute · 125 Ind. App. 519 - Mendenhall, Extr. v. Mendenhall · In Re Estate of Bauer v. Bauer · 132 Ind. App. 1 - Dawson v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Division
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is well established in Indiana that Rule 2-19, supra, and Rule 2-15A require service of a copy of the brief, either in person or by depositing such brief in the United States Mail, or with the Railway Express Agency, Inc., prior to or on the date the same is filed with the Clerk of this court, and failure to do so results in dismissal of the appeal.” (Citing authorities.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Tolbert v. Kern
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.