Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 137 N.C. 163 - Walker v. Railroad

Walker v. Railroad’s Empirical Analysis

1904

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
March 1923
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently March 1923

10 state decisions

70190419101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. State of Alabama · Sherlock v. Alling · Railroad Company v. Fuller · Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Dwyer · Bagg v. Wilmington, Columbia & Augusta Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “No text imposing obligations is understood to demand impossible things.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.