Rollins v. Ebbs.’s Empirical Analysis
1904
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
2
states following
June 1929
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Blacknall v. . Parish · Humphreys v. . Finch · McKee v. . Hicks · Graham v. . Holt · Davenport v. . Sleight
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“13. Have the defendants, Jasper Ebbs, M. L. Duckett, D. P. Plemmons, or either of them, since the signing of the paper-writing or bond, authorized any one to insert the penalty, $13,000, in said bond?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Rollins v. Ebbs.“11. Was the penalty, $13,000, inserted in the paper-writing, purporting to be a bond, at the time the defendant Plemmons signed the same?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Rollins v. Ebbs.“12. Was the penalty, $13,000, inserted in the paper-writing at the time M. L. Duckett signed the same?”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Rollins v. Ebbs.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.