137 N.C. App. 305 - Green v. Dixon’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
20 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Veazey v. City of Durham · Pembee Mfg. Corp. v. Cape Fear Const. Co., Inc. · Thomas M. McInnis & Associates, Inc. v. Hall · Veazey v. City of Durham · 119 N.C. App. 730 - North Carolina Department of Transportation v. Page
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'Under the doctrine of res judicata, a final judgment on the merits in a prior action in a court of competent jurisdiction precludes a second suit involving the same claim between the same parties or those in privity with them.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[i]t is not necessary that precisely the same parties were plaintiffs and defendants in the two suits; provided the same subject in controversy, between two or more of the parties has been directly in issue in the former suit.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“An interlocutory order is one made during the pendency of an action, which does not dispose of the case, but leaves it for further action by the trial court in order to settle and determine the entire controversy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.