Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 137 NCAPP 379 - State v. Rudisill

State v. Rudisill’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Ahearn · State v. Sumpter · Browning-Ferris, Inc. v. Commonwealth · State v. Farlow

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the evidence, by its greater weight, shows that the age of the victim caused the victim to be more vulnerable to the crime committed against him than he otherwise would have been[.]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the victim's age, alone, [did] not demonstrate that he was more vulnerable to the assault ... than an older child would have been.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “in cases where the child is of such tender age that the vulnerability is established by consideration of the nature of the crime.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.