Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 137 N.J.L. 497 - State v. Hogan

State v. Hogan’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
January 1989
most recently cited

3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently January 1989

3 state decisions

1019481950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. D'Adame · State v. Bolitho

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This cross-examination is permitted for the sole purpose of neutralizing or of wiping the slate clean of the unexpected adverse testimony of the witness and is to be clearly distinguished from impeachment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.