Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 137 N.M. 207 - Edens v. Edens

Edens v. Edens’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mark V, Inc. v. Mellekas · Kelly Inn No. 102, Inc. v. Kapnison · Meiboom v. Watson · Cooper v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. · Apodaca v. AAA Gas Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An abuse of discretion occurs when the ruling is clearly against the logic and effect of the facts and circumstances of the ease. We cannot say the trial court abused its discretion by its ruling unless we can characterize it as clearly untenable or not justified by reason. When there exist reasons both supporting and detracting from a trial court decision, there is no abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.