State v. Franco’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
91 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 91 later decisions — most recently March 2024 · most notably Montgomery v. Lomos Altos, Inc. (2006), State v. Gutierrez (2011)
91 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Swafford v. State · State v. Foster · Pandelli v. United States · State v. Sosa
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 91 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The proper analytical framework is whether the facts presented at trial establish that the jury reasonably could have inferred independent factual bases for the charged offenses.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gwynne · State v. Gonzales“but rather depends on the elements of the charged offenses and the facts presented at trial.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gwynne · State v. Gonzales“To determine whether a defendant's conduct was unitary, we consider such factors as whether acts were close in time and space, their similarity, the sequence in which they occurred, whether other events intervened, and the defendant's goals for and mental state during each act.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gonzales · State v. Quick
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.