Lopez v. Reddy’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently October 2021 · most notably Schneider National Inc. v. State, Taxation & Revenue Department (2006), State v. Lente (2005)
30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · State v. Torres · Pharmaseal Laboratories, Inc. v. Goffe · State v. Alberico
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Rule 11-702 [NMRA] establishes three prerequisites for admission of expert testimony: (1) the expert must be qualified, (2) the scientific evidence must assist the trier of fact, and (3) the expert may only testify to scientific, technical or other specialized knowledge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hughey“and the court's determination of this question will not be disturbed on appeal, unless there has been an abuse of this discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Downey“The qualifications of an expert are dependent on the type of negligence claimed and the medical complexity involved.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.