Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 137 N.M. 92 - State v. Boergadine

State v. Boergadine’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
1
states following
July 2023
most recently cited

72 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably State v. Dylan J. (2009), State v. Collins (2007)

72 state decisions

340200520102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Swafford v. State · State v. Rojo · Lee v. Lee · Matter of Adoption of Doe · State v. Rowell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Such indicia include the timing, location, and sequencing of the acts, the existence of an intervening event, the defendant's intent as evidenced by his conduct and utterances, and the number of victims.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “To establish a prima facie case of ineffective assistance of counsel, [the d]efendant must show that (1) counsel's performance was deficient in that it fell below an objective standard of reasonableness; and (2) that [the d]efendant suffered prejudice in that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “to determine whether there was a sufficient showing of distinctness between a defendant's acts”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.