Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 137 N.Y. 307 - Page v. . Krekey

Page v. . Krekey’s Empirical Analysis

1893

Citation profile

81
cited by 81 later decisions
9
states following
July 2002
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 66 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 81 later decisions — most recently July 2002 · most notably 2 E.H. Smith 241 - Smith v. . Molleson (1896), Marden v. . Dorthy (1899)

7 federal appellate · 66 state decisions

190189319001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chapman v. . Rose · McWilliams v. . Mason · Whitney v. Snyder · Henderson v. Marvin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 81 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Sometimes releases, discharges and other instruments are procured by the fraud of a third person, without the knowledge or participation in the fraud of the party to be benefited, who, nevertheless, will not be permitted to reap the benefit of a fraud, though he was himself innocent. The case of Bedell v. Bedell (37 Hun; 419) is an example of this class of cases. The decisions in these cases rest upon principles obviously just and reasonable. When the fraudulent act is not imputable to the person claiming the benefit of the instrument, upon the principle of agency, he is generally debarred from enforcing it upon the ground of the fraudulent origin of the paper and the fact that he has lost nothing upon the faith of it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.