137 Ohio App. 3d 469 - Nilavar v. Osborn’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
93 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 113 later decisions — most recently March 2026 · most notably 173 Ohio App. 3d 284 - Jarupan v. Hanna (2007), 148 Ohio App. 3d 1 - Powell v. Grant Med. Ctr. (2002)
93 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · State v. Dehass · Seasons Coal Co. v. City of Cleveland · Strother v. Hutchinson · Miller v. Bike Athletic Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 113 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`the existence of a contract, performance by the plaintiff, breach by the defendant, and damage or loss to the plaintiff.'”
12 later decisions quote this exact passage“To prove the existence of a contract, a plaintiff must show that both parties consented to the terms of the contract, that there was a `meeting of the minds' of both parties, and that the terms of the contract are definite and certain.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“[p]arties may obtain discovery regarding any matter, not privileged, which is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending action.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.